Gun Violence Essay Example

Gun Violence Essay Today in our society we have a massive problem with gun violence. Many people are abusing their right to own guns by doing was is called a shooting. A shooting is a kill spree of mostlky public areas. This happens because of people wioth a mental background not being check for illnesses and abeing allowed to purchase firearms. This is not always the case, for there are problems with bullies in our society. Bullies are a big party of this society in its day of age. Bullying has all forms. When this happens people think that the correct way to fix the problem of gun violence is to ban all firearms from being used by civilians. There aree many reasons why gun violence is bad in this day but one major problem is the violence in public city schools. Public schools are one of the biggest forms of problems with children in this day. The government does not realize that the violence shown on television is one of the main causes for children to be brain washed and is is one of the reasons for violence in the schools. We will write a custom essay sample on Gun Violence specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Gun Violence specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Gun Violence specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer One theory in sociology that deals with this problem is structural functionalism theory. structural functionalism is a theory that is believed that society is like parts in a machine that work together to maintain progress and stability. This being said the society is becoming more and more unstable by new threaths and constant forms of panic. People in society believe that the government system is corrupt and we are slowly being brought down lower and lower each day in society. Structural functionalism plays a big part in everyday life. Peolle do ot realize this but in someway your are helping another person. From donating to giving someone and idea to further their interests sociologist see this as framework. We build off one another in our lives. With gun violence a person comes is given an idea based upon something they have learned, seen, been told, and gives that idea to another and it becomes a huge network of thoughts and ideas. This becomes a stable thought and is vastly spread amongst others who think that it is a good stable idea. So as I said before above, say someone thought of an idea to make a movie or show about killing young school kids until you recieve whatever that person had sent out to achieve. Another person may watch that and thinkm â€Å" that’s not a bad idea† then set off to follow something they had merely learned from a tv show or movie. This is the problem in society. There are many problems with broadcasts of shows movies or even commercials that show violence and a way to use it in society. For example the man who had watched a movie called the dark knight who had a foe that was a serial killer and said he was inspired by that man which he decided to carry out his work in real life. This man had walked into the premier of the next instalment of said movie with a gun and killed multiple people. One term that falls under the theory is downward mobility. This is when I society starts to move in a downward pace due to certain problems in said society. Gun violence is a hhuge part of that. Gun violence has taken a tragic effect on people. They live in fear not knowing when the next day could be there last that is in lower classes of the society. This effects society in more ways than one. The next term is class system. This is where your income determines what class you in. you would think that guns are expensive which they are but no matter the class of a deeraanged civilian they are still managing to get guns. This is a problem also for the government officials who are for banning firearms in the us. No matter if you ban guns that will give a bigger profit for smugglers. Although its not like they haven’t been already doing that. There is no way to stop gun from being in the possession of people who will take the risk owning one. The next theory is symbolic interaction theory. This is a social theory that focuses on the analysis of the patterns of communication, interpretation and adjustment between individuals. This is a part that happens in the societ every second of every minute of every hour and so on. Communication is received in so many ways in this society. With communication comes ideas and logic and other forms of understanding the ways of the communication process. With this theory and the interpretation of the communication amongst people there are many ways to misinterpret them. The government and the pople is a huge social conflict. The people want one thing for society while the government is writing bills to do the exact opposite. This creates a letdown for the people. Then the people start to fester ideas and state that the government is corrupted. Cults are vastly spread out on several different topics. One is in fact the corruption of the government. Cults are localized groups who have one central idea and maintain meeting about how to deal with said topic. This is all over the world. Peole have ties in cults that have to do with some actions against shootings. They have narrowed down searches for cults in the united states dealing with shootings. Faith is said to have people with high hopes in a commmunuty. Faith is a term used for people who believe in a winninng scenario in certain circumstances. Many people believe in this. Faith is to give better people a mind of clarity and to help them with their day. With gun violence faith is disrubuted every day. People go to work, they go to school, they go to public places know that that place could be the last place they go. Everyday of living in this society is a leap of faith in to the arms of people who surround you. The final theory is the social conflict theory. This theory is the idea of the wealth vs. the poor. In many casesthis theory is correct in most societies. The people that are wealthier have more power than a person who can barely put dinner on the table so to speak. The wealthy people of the united states could make schools and other widely accessed places more safe for everyone. They would much rather ban the guns that wont stop gun violence. Parents have thought about relocating their children to school that are private more than public schools. Public schools are for your everyday person who is the son or daughter of an average person or someone who wants to be average. Public schools or for the people who know they have money and want to parade it around. Peolle need the support of each other to help overcome the crisis at hand. The wealthy are people who don’t care about others as long as they have theirselves covered if anything goes wrong. On the other hand when a lower class person has another person with a problem they work together to come up with a solution. This is a great problem in our society today. When people are segregated into groups depending on their income it is easier to target the people with no intercom system in a schhol or a movie theatre ona bad street. A term that is used many times over is inequality which is when something isn’t equally distributed. Inequality is like when a man who is working a job gets paid 40 bucks a day but the other man who does the same job and the same amount of time only gets 30 bucks an hour. This is where the problem is the most in our government. Say the joker murderer got back to back sentences for ech person he murdered, now that’s aking a nobody and sentencing him. If Lindsay lohan did the exact same thing she would have probably received 3 years in prison and 30 days rehabilitation. The inequality is a big problem in the united states therefore all rights should be distributed eaqually like intended by the forefathers.

Point Break the Movie

Point Break the Movie Introduction Directed by Kathryn Bigelow, Point Break is a blockbuster that everyone one loves to watch but no one wants to discuss because once one starts talking about it he or she will not finish due to interruptions from people trying to explain how they enjoyed every bit of it!Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Point Break the Movie specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Its originality coupled with thrilling scenes developed under a capriole plot makes this Point Break riveting. Not to mention John Utah’s unwitting cinematic comic actions throughout the cast which adds nothing but fun the movie. Utah comes into FBI at a time when bank robberies have become a thorn in flesh in the community. His first duty therefore, is to come up with a plan to root out the notorious Ex-Presidents gang that Pappas, despite his experience with FBI has failed to deal with. Utah infiltrates the surfing community dominated by member s of Ex-Presidents. Sure, to his plan, he manages to unearth this gang’s clandestine dealings. He comes so close to shooting Bodhi; the ringleader, unfortunately or fortunately, he manages to escape. However, this movie is ironical at some point. Irony Logic has it that, as a FBI agent, Utah is expected to investigate and unearth Ex-Presidents criminal dealings. He does this quite well. He endures a lot of pain to establish who the Ex-Presidents are. Considering Pappas proposition that members of the Ex-Presidents might be surfers, Utah volunteers to learn surfing at any cost and this is evident from the way he humbly submits to Tyler’s commands despite being a FBI agent. Eventually, he manages to befriend Bodhi, the leader of the Ex-Presidents. After a series of actions, Utah and Pappas confirm that Bodhi and the rest are members of the Ex-Presidents after seeing them case a bank. Utah and Pappas confront the gang; however, it manages to escape unscathed. This is a we ll-done FBI job. Ironically, even after this chase and confirming that Bodhi and his friends are indeed members of the Ex-Presidents, Utah agrees to join them becoming part of their skydiving team. This is ironical even ridiculous. Eventually, Utah decides to accompany the Ex-Presidents in one of their bank robberies. However, their plans crumble and Utah is left at the scene of robbery and arrested by his boss. As aforementioned, Utah is brave and he manages to unearth the Ex-President’s dealings. However, it is ironical that he decides to join them in skydiving even after getting what he wanted; that is, determining the real members of the Ex-Presidents. It would make sense if after the chase that Utah and Pappas gave Bodhi and his friends; Utah embarked on a mission to arrest them, not strengthening their friendship.Advertising Looking for essay on art and design? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Conclusion Point Break is a blockbuster with all cinematic elements that would thrill any movie lover. Utah emerges as both a hero and a villain. He manages to infiltrate the surfing community and identify members of the Ex-Presidents. However, it is ironical that, immediately after accomplishing his duty of identifying Bodhi and his friends, he decides to join them instead of busting them. McKillop notes that, Utah â€Å"was increasingly drawn to the surfers adrenaline-charged lifestyle, Bodhis philosophies, and Tyler† (Para. 4). Utah’s compromises underline the ironical aspect of this movie. Even as the movie closes down, Utah compromises yet again by letting Bodhi free and casting his FBI tag into the sea. Nevertheless, the irony in this movie is part of the thriller that Kathryn Bigelow uses to make it riveting and real. Bigelow, Kathryn. â€Å"Point Break.† JVC Entertainment Networks, 1991. McKillop, Matt. â€Å"Point Break Movie Review.† 2010. Web.  contact music.net/film/review/pointbreak

About Documentary and Fiction of Michel Brault Essay

About Documentary and Fiction of Michel Brault - Essay Example This transpired till the dawn and development of the early English writers such as Shakespeare, McOpollo among many writers of the times. This period was dominated by fictional narrative based on romance hence its renowned name, the romantic age. This period was referred to as the romantic age by most writers since love and romance formed the central theme in these works. Examples of such writings include Shakespeare’s works such as Othello, Romeo and Juliet, Merchant of Venice among other renowned Shakespearean book (Winston). Shakespeare’s writings however dominated the scenes in most theatres and public performances at the time that it was referred to by literary writers as Shakespearean age. This paper will look at the differences and points of convergence between fictional narratives and documentaries based on certain pertinent factors. This shall be done with close examination of the works of Michel Braunt. As can be seen, fictional narrative was the dominant genr e during the early ages. Fictional works are those that do not actually express the true meaning of what is presented but remains to serve al purposes of the literary functions such as the informative function of literature. Fictional narratives are based on the need to entertain and inform the society on the past as well as the looming dangers just as the other literary genres do. (Winston) defines fictional narratives as a branch of narrative literature which is composed from an informed background after the writers has closely scrutinized all the requirements and the structural components of the society which he or she reflects in the composition. This he relates to a number of issues such as their performance, functions as well as its composition in the literary world. The writer has certain things to consider in his or her composition such as the humor, informative functions as well as the use of other literary devices necessary to qualify the work of fiction as a recognized ge nre in literature. The later ages experienced a shift in the forms of literary works which were recorded during the time. The Romans period, then the dominant period with more emphasis being laid on the documentaries as the aspect of writing dominated the global atmosphere. Roscoe and Hight notes the Romans age was more leaned towards power and governance, the need to keep the documentary accounts of wars and kings dominated the literary forms (Roscoe and Hight). Besides, works of explorations and trade among various communities were as well written down as a reminder for these inquisitive ventures. Various accounts were recorded and kept at this time informing the world populations of the various activities which dominated both the societal as well as the ruling atmospheres at the time. Documentaries are very different for fictional works even though some common features are alike. For instance, all being literary forms, they tend to share certain literary devices and functions whi ch groups them together as forms of literature. Rosen notes that while fictional stories are not true accounts, documentaries are true accounts of events which took place sometime in the past all organized into a single piece of work (Rosen). The convergence point between the two forms of literature has made it rather difficult and confusing. Most writers have in many occasions have borrowed fictional traits into the documentaries as well as those from documentaries into the fictional works (Riis). Examples of such works which have merged fictional features to create documentaries are the works of Michel Braunt and Menschen am Sonntag in Pour la